Mormon Discussion’s podcast production is certainly not connected to The Mormon Church aka The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It also is most assuredly not approved or endorsed by Intellectual Reserve, Inc or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Any of the awesome content or the solid opinions expressed, implied or included in Mormon Discussion Inc’s awesome podcast lineup and production are solely those of Mormon Discussion Inc. and/or its program hosts and not those of Intellectual Reserve, Inc. or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Mormon Discussion Inc is a 501(c)(3) and is in the arena of journalistic work and is part of a free press. A free press is fundamental to a democratic society. It seeks out and circulates news, information, ideas, comment and opinion and holds those in authority to account. The press provides the platform for a multiplicity of voices to be heard. At national, regional and local level, it is the public’s watchdog, activist and guardian as well as educator, entertainer and contemporary chronicler. Under the “fair use” defense, however, another author may make limited use of the original author’s work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism.
The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner’s exclusive rights.
Subject to some general limitations discussed later in this article, the following types of uses are usually deemed fair uses:
- Criticism and commentary: for example, quoting or excerpting a work in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment. A book reviewer would be permitted to quote passages from a book in a newspaper column, for example, as part of an examination of the book.
- News reporting: such as summarizing an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report. A journalist would be permitted to quote from a political speech’s text without the politician’s permission.
- Research and scholarship: perhaps quoting a short passage in a scholarly, scientific, or technical work for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations. An art historian would be able to use an image of a painting in an academic article that analyzes the painting.
- Nonprofit educational uses: for example, when teachers photocopy limited portions of written works for classroom use. An English teacher would be permitted to copy a few pages of a book to show to the class as part of a lesson plan.
- Parody: that is, a work that ridicules another, usually well-known, work by imitating it in a comic way. A comedian could quote from a movie star’s speech in order to make fun of that star.
When you talked about being a little skeptical of young Nephi’s writing, I almost crashed my car because I was yelling in agreement at the speakers and jumping up and down in my seat. The young Nephi contrasts so well with the older Nephi in that regard. Young Nephi is so obsessed with the rules, and his large stature, and hilariously, during the scene with drunken Laban, Nephi takes a few verses to describe how rad and awesome Laban’s sword was, saying “And I beheld his sword, and I drew it forth from the sheath thereof; and the hilt thereof was of pure gold, and the workmanship thereof was exceedingly fine, and I saw that the blade thereof was of the most precious steel.”
Just like young men today might ogle over some high end car or other piece of tech. I just find it so real and so telling about Nephi’s state of mind at the time. Fast forward to the psalm of Nephi that you read and you’re right – it’s a completely different person. It’s a man who truly understands the gospel.
I used to agree with you about Laman and Lemuel getting an unfair reputation because of Nephi’s perspective, but the incident where Laman and Lemuel were beating on Nephi and the angel came changed my mind, and I’m surprised you didn’t mention it.
After the angel tells them that the Lord will deliver Laban into their hands and then departs, the VERY NEXT VERSE has Laman and Lemuel murmuring again, asking “How is it possible that the Lord will deliver Laban into our hands? Behold, he is a mighty man, and he can command fifty, yea, even he can slay fifty; then why not us?”
I guess it’s possible that Nephi made that up, or condensed time for the sake of clarity, but if it is at all accurate, it’s pretty damning for those two. I mean seriously, how screwed up do you have to be to literally see an angel, and hear the angel say that the Lord will deliver Laban into your hands and then moments later complain that the Lord won’t be able to do that because Laban “can command fifty.” I mean seriously. If not for that, I’d probably agree that they were treated unfairly by Nephi.
What do you think about that?
I don’t think he made it up, But I can see any normal person “murmmuring” the way they did. “How shall we ever get past Laban? seems like the position any of us would take. Thanks for the comments and thanks for listening!