Mormon Discussion’s podcast production is certainly not connected to The Mormon Church aka The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It also is most assuredly not approved or endorsed by Intellectual Reserve, Inc or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Any of the awesome content or the solid opinions expressed, implied or included in Mormon Discussion Inc’s awesome podcast lineup and production are solely those of Mormon Discussion Inc. and/or its program hosts and not those of Intellectual Reserve, Inc. or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Mormon Discussion Inc is a 501(c)(3) and is in the arena of journalistic work and is part of a free press. A free press is fundamental to a democratic society. It seeks out and circulates news, information, ideas, comment and opinion and holds those in authority to account. The press provides the platform for a multiplicity of voices to be heard. At national, regional and local level, it is the public’s watchdog, activist and guardian as well as educator, entertainer and contemporary chronicler. Under the “fair use” defense, however, another author may make limited use of the original author’s work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism.
The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner’s exclusive rights.
Subject to some general limitations discussed later in this article, the following types of uses are usually deemed fair uses:
- Criticism and commentary: for example, quoting or excerpting a work in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment. A book reviewer would be permitted to quote passages from a book in a newspaper column, for example, as part of an examination of the book.
- News reporting: such as summarizing an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report. A journalist would be permitted to quote from a political speech’s text without the politician’s permission.
- Research and scholarship: perhaps quoting a short passage in a scholarly, scientific, or technical work for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations. An art historian would be able to use an image of a painting in an academic article that analyzes the painting.
- Nonprofit educational uses: for example, when teachers photocopy limited portions of written works for classroom use. An English teacher would be permitted to copy a few pages of a book to show to the class as part of a lesson plan.
- Parody: that is, a work that ridicules another, usually well-known, work by imitating it in a comic way. A comedian could quote from a movie star’s speech in order to make fun of that star.
This episode is personal. I had been wondering for some time if this story should be shared or not but felt their are principles in my experience that might help each of us better handle the conflict that comes between those whose faith is complex and nuanced and those whose faith is more simplified. Both sides think the other is off base and yet perhaps if we are humble there is something to be learned. I would really love feedback on this episode and hope you might email me at [email protected]
Thank you so much for your message on patriarchal blessings. I, too, have had similar questions. I have three thoughts to share…
1) I’ve heard that husbands’ and wives’ blessings will often complement each other. I’m not sure how true that is, but is is something to think about.
2) My three siblings had an interesting experience. They all received their blessings from the same person within close proximity of time. I received mine years later from a different Patriarch. The Patriarch from whom they received their blessings had an affair and was ex-communicated. My siblings were given the opportunity to have their blessings re-given but were also told it wasn’t necessary. Two of my siblings decided to have their’s re-given. Interestingly, their blessings were extremely similar to their original blessings, and both new blessings touched on all the same topics as their first blessings.
3) Parts of my blessing seem so hum-drum and touch on some very basic topics. It wasn’t until many years later that, like you, I saw the “wording” that made sense only for me in later years, and things came together.
I’ve found that many of my struggles are resolved many, many years later as I choose to be patient through my wrestlings… Waiting for the tree to bring forth fruit. Then, and only then, do the pieces tumble into a straight line and I am able to proceed again.
Heidi, Thank you so much. I always appreciate feedback from listeners…. it means the world to me. I agree with you that spouses would be similar and while I still have frustrations, I also see the inspiration in it as well.
Bill Reel
That part where you says listeners definitely sounds unique.
I honestly walked into receiving my patriarchal blessing not expecting much and leaving very much impressed. Impressed because the man who gave it to me didn’t seem very eloquent with words, but when he pronounced the blessing he very much seemed so… When I received my blessing I thought he left out parts that he had pronounced, so when I read it I often conjure the mental images of the things he left out and consider it personal revelation. There is a lot more I could say about this… but that would be just me rambling on.