Mormon Discussion’s podcast production is certainly not connected to The Mormon Church aka The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It also is most assuredly not approved or endorsed by Intellectual Reserve, Inc or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Any of the awesome content or the solid opinions expressed, implied or included in Mormon Discussion Inc’s awesome podcast lineup and production are solely those of Mormon Discussion Inc. and/or its program hosts and not those of Intellectual Reserve, Inc. or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Mormon Discussion Inc is a 501(c)(3) and is in the arena of journalistic work and is part of a free press. A free press is fundamental to a democratic society. It seeks out and circulates news, information, ideas, comment and opinion and holds those in authority to account. The press provides the platform for a multiplicity of voices to be heard. At national, regional and local level, it is the public’s watchdog, activist and guardian as well as educator, entertainer and contemporary chronicler. Under the “fair use” defense, however, another author may make limited use of the original author’s work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism.
The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner’s exclusive rights.
Subject to some general limitations discussed later in this article, the following types of uses are usually deemed fair uses:
- Criticism and commentary: for example, quoting or excerpting a work in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment. A book reviewer would be permitted to quote passages from a book in a newspaper column, for example, as part of an examination of the book.
- News reporting: such as summarizing an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report. A journalist would be permitted to quote from a political speech’s text without the politician’s permission.
- Research and scholarship: perhaps quoting a short passage in a scholarly, scientific, or technical work for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations. An art historian would be able to use an image of a painting in an academic article that analyzes the painting.
- Nonprofit educational uses: for example, when teachers photocopy limited portions of written works for classroom use. An English teacher would be permitted to copy a few pages of a book to show to the class as part of a lesson plan.
- Parody: that is, a work that ridicules another, usually well-known, work by imitating it in a comic way. A comedian could quote from a movie star’s speech in order to make fun of that star.
As I have attended various firesides and opened myself up to Questions and Answers, what seems to be the most interesting points is the specific ways I reconcile tensions in Mormonism. Recently in particular a group of folks were deeply intrigued at how I approach a Temple Interview. That for them there is such a discomfort that they barely can make it through receiving a recommend at the end or simply do not “pass” and are amazed at the fact that at least at present I hold a valid current Temple Recommend. So today I go through the questions. Helping listeners to see my approach. for listeners to see how I define terms and what my thoughts are as I go through the important experience within Mormonism. I hope this is helpful. Thanks for listening!
Thank you for those insights, they are very helpful.
I’m a writer and words fail me. Thank you so much for sharing your heart and thoughts. This is just what I’ve been needing.
This was very timely! My recommend expired yesterday and for the first time in nearly 25 years I’m not comfortable renewing it. Thank you for your insight, it’s given me hope and lots to think about. (P.S.- I loved the sound of the rain in the background! I’m in Seattle and the sound of rain is comforting ????)
While I can appreciate the thoughts regarding the word “sustain” and how that might help you reconcile the conflict you feel around the question “do you sustain your church leaders”, I can’t help but point out that I am pretty sure the intent behind the word is more in line with Google’s first definition and not the second. I think a very enlightening exercise would be to see how the church translates that question into other languages and the word choices they make in doing so. We talk a lot about sustaining leaders, but let’s not get caught up in the messiness of the English language.
even your own comment lends awareness that it is not 100% set in stone
Section 89 isn’t a commandment. You can’t decide that it is or isn’t, because it explicitly states in the body of the revelation that it ISN’T to be given by way of commandment, but by way of greeting. It is a principle with promise, as differentiated from a commandment.