Mormon Discussion’s podcast production is certainly not connected to The Mormon Church aka The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It also is most assuredly not approved or endorsed by Intellectual Reserve, Inc or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Any of the awesome content or the solid opinions expressed, implied or included in Mormon Discussion Inc’s awesome podcast lineup and production are solely those of Mormon Discussion Inc. and/or its program hosts and not those of Intellectual Reserve, Inc. or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Mormon Discussion Inc is a 501(c)(3) and is in the arena of journalistic work and is part of a free press. A free press is fundamental to a democratic society. It seeks out and circulates news, information, ideas, comment and opinion and holds those in authority to account. The press provides the platform for a multiplicity of voices to be heard. At national, regional and local level, it is the public’s watchdog, activist and guardian as well as educator, entertainer and contemporary chronicler. Under the “fair use” defense, however, another author may make limited use of the original author’s work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism.
The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner’s exclusive rights.
Subject to some general limitations discussed later in this article, the following types of uses are usually deemed fair uses:
- Criticism and commentary: for example, quoting or excerpting a work in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment. A book reviewer would be permitted to quote passages from a book in a newspaper column, for example, as part of an examination of the book.
- News reporting: such as summarizing an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report. A journalist would be permitted to quote from a political speech’s text without the politician’s permission.
- Research and scholarship: perhaps quoting a short passage in a scholarly, scientific, or technical work for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations. An art historian would be able to use an image of a painting in an academic article that analyzes the painting.
- Nonprofit educational uses: for example, when teachers photocopy limited portions of written works for classroom use. An English teacher would be permitted to copy a few pages of a book to show to the class as part of a lesson plan.
- Parody: that is, a work that ridicules another, usually well-known, work by imitating it in a comic way. A comedian could quote from a movie star’s speech in order to make fun of that star.
When you say… “be the Buddha”, isn’t that the equivalent of saying be your own God?
Be the God, be the Christ?
I think it means retain your authority to be, to decide, to act. Maybe that’s what God does. Certainly corresponds to what we think of Godly attributes.
Another great episode, thanks Jack!
Thank you so much for listening!
I think you are right about being addicted to authority and hierarchy.
Its sad it happens so much, because our ability to choose for ourselves is weakened by the very culture we live in. We are ALWAYS taught to defer to authority, and as we do that, the culture reinforces it. Its a vicious cycle of creating “sheeple”.
There’s a time when it’s good to follow. But at some point all need to own their thoughts and decisions and conclusions.
Jack…one interesting thing is the cultural pressure to NOT make your own choices. Didn’t Elder Oaks give a talk on 2 ways to receive revelation: one from the authorities and one from your own spiritual experience? If I recall, Oaks said that if you receive ANY impressions that are in opposition to the leadership, you can be certain its from satan.
I found that talk VERY disconcerting.
That talk discounts the historical times when clear mistakes have been made by leadership. For example: Adam God, killing those who engage in interracial marriage, declaring that all american Indians are Lamanites,…etc.
Those are things, both internally and externally that have been proven false or otherwise disavowed. So, what Oaks is saying is if people prayed and didn’t agree with the original teaching (which was WRONG), then they are led by Satan?
The whole idea of deferring to authority in the church?…I think its dangerous.
Agreed. There are times and things that can cause some anxiety if you organize your life that way. At the same time the institution needs order. There’s an implied agreement: follow for the institution’s sake, the groups sake. And we (organizers) will be careful how far we go. Learning to navigate these dynamics is part of our personal challenges in life.
Insightful again. The New Alan Watts walk-in…
Haha! Nice Alan Watts reference! I dare not accept the comparison though. Watts was too awesome!