Mormon Discussion’s podcast production is certainly not connected to The Mormon Church aka The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It also is most assuredly not approved or endorsed by Intellectual Reserve, Inc or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Any of the awesome content or the solid opinions expressed, implied or included in Mormon Discussion Inc’s awesome podcast lineup and production are solely those of Mormon Discussion Inc. and/or its program hosts and not those of Intellectual Reserve, Inc. or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Mormon Discussion Inc is a 501(c)(3) and is in the arena of journalistic work and is part of a free press. A free press is fundamental to a democratic society. It seeks out and circulates news, information, ideas, comment and opinion and holds those in authority to account. The press provides the platform for a multiplicity of voices to be heard. At national, regional and local level, it is the public’s watchdog, activist and guardian as well as educator, entertainer and contemporary chronicler. Under the “fair use” defense, however, another author may make limited use of the original author’s work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism.
The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner’s exclusive rights.
Subject to some general limitations discussed later in this article, the following types of uses are usually deemed fair uses:
- Criticism and commentary: for example, quoting or excerpting a work in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment. A book reviewer would be permitted to quote passages from a book in a newspaper column, for example, as part of an examination of the book.
- News reporting: such as summarizing an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report. A journalist would be permitted to quote from a political speech’s text without the politician’s permission.
- Research and scholarship: perhaps quoting a short passage in a scholarly, scientific, or technical work for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations. An art historian would be able to use an image of a painting in an academic article that analyzes the painting.
- Nonprofit educational uses: for example, when teachers photocopy limited portions of written works for classroom use. An English teacher would be permitted to copy a few pages of a book to show to the class as part of a lesson plan.
- Parody: that is, a work that ridicules another, usually well-known, work by imitating it in a comic way. A comedian could quote from a movie star’s speech in order to make fun of that star.
Yep. Panentheism is the ticket. 🙂
Nice interview, good thoughts.
Yeah, it’s right there in D&C 88.
Awesome stuff guys, reminds me of the time I was chewed out for saying that I wasn’t sure if I really believed in God anymore over the sacrament pulpit in a testimony meeting.
I got a plenty of negative feedback for sharing that, but it made a lot of sense meaning that it’s not that I don’t believe anymore just that I believe differently, and I will not surrender my inner authority to other people. The last podcast that Bill Reel made on premium content is just gold too.
Thank you – I am on my 3rd time through this audio. Your talk on FTSOY is great. The comments on halves of life and the deficiency / wholeness model were awesome. In fact the deficiency concept being akin to leading to thinking there is no god is something I have wrestled with. Its worried me to think I am making an atheist argument. I have likened it to a parent giving all kids cars without training and letting them go. Stating good luck. From time to time I’ll reach out to 1 in a billion with a nugget of driving instructions. The thought that God loves me more than I love my kids using that concept has really bothered me. Your tyrant comment hit home for me. I am looking forward to reading Falling Upward. Did Tyler say he wrote a book.
Jack – do you think you could get Richard Rohr as a guest?
Thank you,
Awesome discussion, hope to see Tyler on again.
Thanks for the comments. Tyler will be back soon!
Great podcast, it really hit home for me. Thanks for sharing!
I’ve tried several times to play this podcast and each time it played the air handlers podcast. 🙁
Sorry about that. File name confusion. Should be rectified now!