Mormon Discussion’s podcast production is certainly not connected to The Mormon Church aka The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It also is most assuredly not approved or endorsed by Intellectual Reserve, Inc or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Any of the awesome content or the solid opinions expressed, implied or included in Mormon Discussion Inc’s awesome podcast lineup and production are solely those of Mormon Discussion Inc. and/or its program hosts and not those of Intellectual Reserve, Inc. or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Mormon Discussion Inc is a 501(c)(3) and is in the arena of journalistic work and is part of a free press. A free press is fundamental to a democratic society. It seeks out and circulates news, information, ideas, comment and opinion and holds those in authority to account. The press provides the platform for a multiplicity of voices to be heard. At national, regional and local level, it is the public’s watchdog, activist and guardian as well as educator, entertainer and contemporary chronicler. Under the “fair use” defense, however, another author may make limited use of the original author’s work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism.
The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner’s exclusive rights.
Subject to some general limitations discussed later in this article, the following types of uses are usually deemed fair uses:
- Criticism and commentary: for example, quoting or excerpting a work in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment. A book reviewer would be permitted to quote passages from a book in a newspaper column, for example, as part of an examination of the book.
- News reporting: such as summarizing an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report. A journalist would be permitted to quote from a political speech’s text without the politician’s permission.
- Research and scholarship: perhaps quoting a short passage in a scholarly, scientific, or technical work for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations. An art historian would be able to use an image of a painting in an academic article that analyzes the painting.
- Nonprofit educational uses: for example, when teachers photocopy limited portions of written works for classroom use. An English teacher would be permitted to copy a few pages of a book to show to the class as part of a lesson plan.
- Parody: that is, a work that ridicules another, usually well-known, work by imitating it in a comic way. A comedian could quote from a movie star’s speech in order to make fun of that star.Â
Excellent! It must be time consuming to search it all out. Amazing info. Thank you so much.
Amen (Rah)!
You are welcome!
The words, “Keys, Power and Authority” should be red flags to all that Jesus warned of.
Wasn’t it the Pharisees who said, “Obey Us! Don’t question Us! The debate is Over!?” He said that fruits apply to leaders and especially to prophets doing “good works” in His name.
Matt 7
Yes, Question them! Jesus did not give free passes and He held leaders to the highest standard for their claims. Those making claims are blasphemers against “God” and all of us.
Thanks for your thoughts Tom and for continuing to listen to my ramblings 🙂
Really interesting. In researching a little more about priesthood today, I was struck by how much of the priesthood story, which seems to be missing from first hand accounts of the restoration process, gets filled in with a light dive into freemasonry. (See, for instance, here: http://www.royalarchmasonsalberta.com/index.php/library/aspeslet-library/general/220-high-priesthood-of-melchizedek).
I wonder if the rest of the story was simply rounded out by fitting it with the freemasonry narrative? I could see BY thinking something like, “Hmm. Don’t see the details about what happened to Joseph, but I don’t really need them, because my Masonic brotherhood has known them all along. I know Freemasonry Is True, so I’ll just fill in the blanks.” Not unlike Joseph sketching in missing pieces of Egyptian facsimiles.
Which is why when it comes to Free Masonry and any similarities, they don’t look at it as stealing ideas but rather that Free Masonry has parts that are true but this is the truest of the true!
This is the crux of everything for me in a very big way.
I was always bothered by the fact that as a missionary I mentioned and shortly afterwards Peter, James, and John restored the priesthood implying that it happened near the very beginning of the church establishment. Now not even the Aaronic Priesthood story adds up.
You’re stake president may not be interested in those emails, but I am.
Will you share the emails?
Excellent podcast
Im considering uploading them somewhere. I will let you know.
Please keep doing this work. I have found your podcasts most valuable. In the last week I have gone back through the archives and listened to most of them and some twice. Thank you for clarifying many things and providing links to the original sources. In trying to get a handle on the major shift in thinking that the whole process entails and wanting to hang on to the gospel/church I loved ( and still do to a degree – the good, loving, salt of the earth folks who care about others part anyway) I have often wondered if plain and precious parts of church history were altered by some trickster to make church history look dishonest. However, with all the original material as evidence it becomes clear that plain and precious things were deleted or added upon to disguise an agenda that was not honest. Your efforts have helped me come to peace with some things that I always had in a package of untouchable and evil speaking of the Lord’s anointed. A situation on a local level involving lies from a church leader gave my mind a painful twist about three or four years ago. So I blocked things out of my mind thinking that one dishonest guy doesn’t derail all the other good things. As you have said in other podcasts this is a painful process. You have given me encouragement on getting through this. The question that keeps coming to mind is: “Could I have sustained that?.” When you come across bits of information like a blood atonement approval (and even encouragement for this) by Brigham, for instance, or a comment he made in general conference about how a man with more keys could righteously appropriate another living man’s wife you have to ask that question. It happens over and over. Your podcast on Jesus at the Helm? simplified things in my mind. So thank you many times over. I enjoy listening to your voice and way of speaking as well. Bless you in your continued efforts to give us light and knowledge which brings understanding and a degree of peace. Sincerely, Jim B.
I am interested in those emails as well.