Mormon Discussion’s podcast production is certainly not connected to The Mormon Church aka The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It also is most assuredly not approved or endorsed by Intellectual Reserve, Inc or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Any of the awesome content or the solid opinions expressed, implied or included in Mormon Discussion Inc’s awesome podcast lineup and production are solely those of Mormon Discussion Inc. and/or its program hosts and not those of Intellectual Reserve, Inc. or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Mormon Discussion Inc is a 501(c)(3) and is in the arena of journalistic work and is part of a free press. A free press is fundamental to a democratic society. It seeks out and circulates news, information, ideas, comment and opinion and holds those in authority to account. The press provides the platform for a multiplicity of voices to be heard. At national, regional and local level, it is the public’s watchdog, activist and guardian as well as educator, entertainer and contemporary chronicler. Under the “fair use” defense, however, another author may make limited use of the original author’s work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism.
The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner’s exclusive rights.
Subject to some general limitations discussed later in this article, the following types of uses are usually deemed fair uses:
- Criticism and commentary: for example, quoting or excerpting a work in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment. A book reviewer would be permitted to quote passages from a book in a newspaper column, for example, as part of an examination of the book.
- News reporting: such as summarizing an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report. A journalist would be permitted to quote from a political speech’s text without the politician’s permission.
- Research and scholarship: perhaps quoting a short passage in a scholarly, scientific, or technical work for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations. An art historian would be able to use an image of a painting in an academic article that analyzes the painting.
- Nonprofit educational uses: for example, when teachers photocopy limited portions of written works for classroom use. An English teacher would be permitted to copy a few pages of a book to show to the class as part of a lesson plan.
- Parody: that is, a work that ridicules another, usually well-known, work by imitating it in a comic way. A comedian could quote from a movie star’s speech in order to make fun of that star.
There are definitely still neo nazi and white supremacy in the CDA/Sand Point area. I remember in 2010 seeing them protesting a local Mexican restaurant.
I also saw a younger Klansman walking down the street a few months later in his robe holding his hood in Spokane. People hiding in the woods close to the border.
Please don’t have Rock back. I wanna put this as nicely as possible — he comes across as a bit inconsistent.
First, he’s all “don’t call it a movement” then later refers to it as a “movement.” Which is it, Rock?
He claims anyone can have an audience with Jesus, then admits he hasn’t, because he’s never asked. Why not, Rock?
In younger days, I DID ask. But never got my audience. Why not, Rock?
But mostly, it’s because he seemingly can’t control his discourse enough to leave out his politics. RFM, I’m not here for politics. I’m here for solid evidence of Mormon fraud.
I think for sure we should hear a lot more from Rock Waterman. I don’t know why I can’t help think of Porter Rockwell every time I think of Rock Waterman (Potterman Rockwell).
I think there were too many jokes and laughs all in good nature and too little substance of which I think Rock Waterman genuinely wanted to sincerely express to the audience.
It was very refreshing to hear from him, and it kind of invites the spirit of Stage 3 fowler belief which we can all use from time to time. I do want to hear more from him, even if it means having RFM debunking him afterwards. Bring him back for more.
More Rock Waterman please!!!
But for heavens sake please try to keep him on topic!
Love to hear from both of you again. Great episode.
I’d love to hear more from Rock Waterman. Maybe let Rock propose the talking points next time?