Mormon Discussion’s podcast production is certainly not connected to The Mormon Church aka The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It also is most assuredly not approved or endorsed by Intellectual Reserve, Inc or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Any of the awesome content or the solid opinions expressed, implied or included in Mormon Discussion Inc’s awesome podcast lineup and production are solely those of Mormon Discussion Inc. and/or its program hosts and not those of Intellectual Reserve, Inc. or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Mormon Discussion Inc is a 501(c)(3) and is in the arena of journalistic work and is part of a free press. A free press is fundamental to a democratic society. It seeks out and circulates news, information, ideas, comment and opinion and holds those in authority to account. The press provides the platform for a multiplicity of voices to be heard. At national, regional and local level, it is the public’s watchdog, activist and guardian as well as educator, entertainer and contemporary chronicler. Under the “fair use” defense, however, another author may make limited use of the original author’s work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism.
The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner’s exclusive rights.
Subject to some general limitations discussed later in this article, the following types of uses are usually deemed fair uses:
- Criticism and commentary: for example, quoting or excerpting a work in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment. A book reviewer would be permitted to quote passages from a book in a newspaper column, for example, as part of an examination of the book.
- News reporting: such as summarizing an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report. A journalist would be permitted to quote from a political speech’s text without the politician’s permission.
- Research and scholarship: perhaps quoting a short passage in a scholarly, scientific, or technical work for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations. An art historian would be able to use an image of a painting in an academic article that analyzes the painting.
- Nonprofit educational uses: for example, when teachers photocopy limited portions of written works for classroom use. An English teacher would be permitted to copy a few pages of a book to show to the class as part of a lesson plan.
- Parody: that is, a work that ridicules another, usually well-known, work by imitating it in a comic way. A comedian could quote from a movie star’s speech in order to make fun of that star.
Wow you guys! I have caught up on all 5 episodes now. I feel like I am listening to my own story word for word. Everything you are saying is exactly what’s going on with my husband and I: thoughts, feelings, conversations. Our time frame is a little longer…but wow. I wish I had this 3 years ago. THANK YOU!! I will be introducing you to my husband and will reach out to you. I wish we lived closer- we’re in Dallas if you ever feel the need to come down for some good bbq. 😉
Shoot! I was in Dallas two weeks ago for work! (Not a normal destination for me)
Can’t wait to hear from your husband! Kattie feels the same about you!
Thanks for a great podcast, I love that you would open up and talk openly about everything going on. I think culturally, we have a very dysfunctional knee-jerk reaction to blame the person who has been troubled by the information rather than discussing the troubling information and why it’s troubling. That is not to blame Kattie for her reaction or feelings, it is so cultural. I applaud your efforts to learn about the information and process it. In my life, people dear to me have been reluctant to read the information I want to discuss because they are afraid it will make them lose their testimony. To me, Mormonism was founded on the idea of pursuing truth and letting the chips fall where they may. I hope we get to a point where we are mature enough to adopt this view of the Dalai Lama: “If science proves some belief of Buddhism wrong, then Buddhism will have to change. In my view, science and Buddhism share a search for the truth and for understanding reality. By learning from science about aspects of reality where its understanding may be more advanced, I believe that Buddhism enriches its own worldview.” Mormonism was founded and developed on a 19th Century view of the world. Some of those views do not make sense in the 21st century, I hope we can recognize that, move on and continue pursuing truth.
That quote from the Dalai Lama is BEAUTIFUL!
Allan and Kattie, Bill Reel here. My wife and I listened together to your part 5 and we both thoroughly enjoyed it. The way you play off each other, the kind tone and respect towards each other and the quality of the work your putting out. Amazing and so needed. Great Job you two!!!!
I just wanted to drop a quick comment to say thank you!
I am trying to find a way to introduce my wife to your podcast. We are about two years into my own personal faith transition. While we do try to discuss some things, my wife has had some very emotional responses to what I had thought were some of the “lighter” topics. It makes it difficult to discuss any issues in depth.
Like you Kattie, we have four kids, two very young and at home all day. My wife has attempted to study some things, but is hesitant to delve into anything controversial, even if she had the time to do it.
Anyway, the point is. Thank you!
Allan, you mentioned your letter is around 80 pages. I applaud you for documenting that amount of detail.
What I’ve decided to do in that regard is create a 1-page public Google Doc with links to info about testimony, Joseph Smith, temples, and Brigham Young. It’s viewable at bit.ly/mormonlinks.